Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts
over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan Heenan wrote:
I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? Well if you are listening to the road traffic reports as I am at the moment in Northants, I'd probably say that a severe warning was not enough for most of the 'drivers' out there - reports of multiple accidents and closures and that's WITH gritted roads! -- cupra (remove nospam please to mail) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Typical of this country, unable to cope with a tiny crisis, god knows what
would happen if we had a big one! Pete W " cupra" wrote in message ... Duncan Heenan wrote: I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? Well if you are listening to the road traffic reports as I am at the moment in Northants, I'd probably say that a severe warning was not enough for most of the 'drivers' out there - reports of multiple accidents and closures and that's WITH gritted roads! -- cupra (remove nospam please to mail) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "martin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:46:41 -0000, Pete W wrote: Typical of this country, unable to cope with a tiny crisis, god knows what would happen if we had a big one! So why do you think the problem is unique to Britain? -- Martin its not. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I sort of share your sentaments, there does seem to be a lot more shouting
about the possibilities of severe weather, but a lot of this is hype whipped up by the media rather than serious forecasting from Met O. I can confirm that this newsgroup certainly was read when I was shackled to the Met O to earn my (very)meagre crust. ISIII "Duncan Heenan" wrote in message ... I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "martin" wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:12:38 +0100, martin wrote: On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:34:15 -0000, "Duncan Heenan" wrote: I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? Martin Stubbs http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/tempusfugit/ + http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/tempus...rine/gmdss.htm . There's also Frank Singleton http://www.franksingleton.clara.net I think both are retired now. If you keep careful records of forecast against the actual weather and demonstrate a bias somebody in the Met Office will listen to you. I suspect you are wrong and that you are noticing local differences rather than general ones, after all the forecasts are for large areas. In the West of the Netherlands, where I am located, force 7 winds, thunderstorms and snow were forecast for today. We had a near gale a thunder storm and torrential rain, but no snow, not even frost. Other parts of the West of the Netherlands have had snow. You can of course download the synoptic s and make your own forecasts. There's plenty of weather info on internet. I looked out of the window after posting that and found that there are now several inches of snow here. -- Martin Nothing here on the Isle of Wight yet - but we always have good weather! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now they're moving to Exeter at least they'll be able to look out of the
window at my Devon weather and see what's coming in the next hour. Shame there's a big hill (Haldon) in the way just tio the west of Exeter so they can't see Dartmoor. If you can see dartmoor from here, it's about to rain. If you can't see dartmoor, it is raining. Actually, at the moment its both dark and raining. Does that prove my point? Norman --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.572 / Virus Database: 362 - Release Date: 27/01/2004 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duncan Heenan wrote:
I think I have detected an increasing trend in Met Office Weather forecasts over the past year or so, to exaggerate weather dangers. Not only in general forecasts when it never seems to get as wet, hot, cold, windy etc as they say, but also in shipping and inshore forecasts. A number of times over the last year I have not sailed because of warnings of Gales or F6s and above which have not materialised, and consequently I have missed a good day out. I am now beginning to discount their pessimism a bit, and no doubt one day the forecast will come true and I'll get caught out and they can shout 'We told you so'. I can't help thinking that there's a lawyer somewhere in the background advising them to forecast the worst possible, rather than the most likely, weather, in order to avoid litigation or criticism. (a la M. Fish -'There won't be a Hurricane"). What do you think? I wonder if anyone there reads this newsgroup? My impression of sailing in NW Scotland is that the main shipping forecasts are reasonable, but of course they cover a large area. Weather can be quite local in this region. The inshore forecast (Malin Hd to Cape Wrath and 12 miles offshore) does seem to be a bit pessimistic. I listen to both, also the land forecasts, sketch a synoptic chart and make up my mind as to what to do. If I am near Ireland the forecasts from MetEirean seem to be a bit more realistic, and they are updated every 6 hours. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Technically Mr Fish's comment there wont be a hurricane was true, it was not
a hurricane as the disturbance did not originate in the tropics. Hurricane force winds yes were observed ie F12. The Met office forecasts have grown in accuracy in the last decades. A one day forecast given in 1960 is now as accurate as a 3day forecast in 2004. Inshore water forecasts are diccicult to judge especially in anticyclonic conditions when sea breezes form etc. Frontal features do however complicate the matter but forecasts are improving!!! James Eberlein Department of Meteorology University of Reading |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "spu02je" wrote in message ... Technically Mr Fish's comment there wont be a hurricane was true, it was not a hurricane as the disturbance did not originate in the tropics. Hurricane force winds yes were observed ie F12. The Met office forecasts have grown in accuracy in the last decades. A one day forecast given in 1960 is now as accurate as a 3day forecast in 2004. Inshore water forecasts are diccicult to judge especially in anticyclonic conditions when sea breezes form etc. Frontal features do however complicate the matter but forecasts are improving!!! James Eberlein Department of Meteorology University of Reading James, You sound just like my Fiancee, you meterologists are all the same!! Cheers Simon |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crying Out Loud | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Crying in the wind | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Crying wolf | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Mother earth..I hear you crying! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Mother Earth I hear you crying. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |