Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone have any ideas? With my webcam taking photos every 12 seconds I'd like
to calculate the probability of catching a flash of lightning in the thunderstorms which must be heading our way soon. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Nick Humphries | | The Your Sinclair Rock'n'Roll Years: http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/ | | The YSRnRY TV Show (Coming Soon) http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/tvprog/ | | The Tipshop: http://www.the-tipshop.co.uk/ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03 Aug 2003 14:52:05 GMT, (SSpiers) wrote:
That'a a coincidence,i was just reading about that! http://www.lightningtrigger.com/ Simon A quarter of a second. Ah. 48-1 chance of my webcam capturing a strike... I guess I can bump up the capture framerate on demand... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Nick Humphries | | The Your Sinclair Rock'n'Roll Years: http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/ | | The YSRnRY TV Show (Coming Soon) http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/tvprog/ | | The Tipshop: http://www.the-tipshop.co.uk/ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 16:55:22 GMT, Pieter Kuiper wrote:
Maybe one can do something with motion detection software. But by the time it's been detected it's probably finished... A single flash is going to be substantially less than a single frame in duration a whole strike (ie a sequence of flashes) may well take the 6 frames or so that occupy 1/4s. You need to be able to compare adjacent frames in pretty much the frame blanking period which isn't very long if you going to stand any chance. Other problems I can envisage are exposure and electronic shutters. Lighting is very bright, unless you can set the exposure of the webcam I'd expect no much better than a peak white frame. An electronic shutter may mean that an image is only caputured for a very short period of time around 1/500 to 1/1000s so the cahnces of teh shutter actually being open when a flash occurs become even slimmer. Electronic shutters are some times used as a easy form of automatic exposure control. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Flash new space tools to monitor lightning | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
No lightning - not a flash | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Rainfall Duration | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Short duration 3mb fall/rise Fair Isle | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Annual duration of rainfall | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |