Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David
Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". In an article in the Mail on Sunday Bellamy rails against claims that "mans actions could ultimately destroy the planet" as the 'biggest scam to hit the world'. He criticises the Government for resorting to 'scare tactics' to justify its misguided crusade. He said 'It is scientifically proven that 99 per cent of the worlds greenhouse emissions come from natural sources over which we have no control. Yet millions are being spent which will have no effect whatsoever on global warming. The money should be spent on providing fresh water and sanitation to the most deprived areas of the world' Blimey! I would not have expected that from him off all people. I had a further search on the net and found reference to a letter in New Scientist titled "hooray for global warming" Alas as I am an 'anti-scientist' I couldn't access the archives. There has also been a riposte to Sir david houghton (chief government advisor to St Tony) in the daily Telegraph. Now Saint Tony Blair of course has stated that "Global warming was the most serious long term threat facing the planet' and has vowed to cut emmisions by 15.2 per cent (I assume the .2 per cent is Prescott's two jags) by 2010! Off course the Sainted Tony being a scientist by nature (unlike me according to the great Chief Dancey with wolves) is a devout catholic (you know the lot that still teach that the world was made in seven days). Now he and his "new-age" wife Cherie , recently went through a rebirthing ceremony in Mexico. Apparently they rubbed lots of mud, fruit and vegetables into each others bodies. Well all I can say is, that before wicked humans entered the industrial age it was common for folk to carry out a very similar activity; it was called the "Stocks and Pillories"! I now await for those methane producing human stools, to hit the wind-turbines. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". I saw that Lawrence. Wasn't sure whether Bellany is showing early signs of dementia or he needed the publicity (a book coming out?) !! :-))) Victor |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Victor West" wrote in message ... "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". I saw that Lawrence. Wasn't sure whether Bellany is showing early signs of dementia or he needed the publicity (a book coming out?) !! :-))) Victor At first I thought it was a spoof, but it appears to be genuine. Whether liberties have been taken with context I can't say. The rest about Blair though is 100% true co's I said so. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lawrence" wrote in message ... "Victor West" wrote in message ... "lawrence jenkins" wrote in message ... OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". I saw that Lawrence. Wasn't sure whether Bellany is showing early signs of dementia or he needed the publicity (a book coming out?) !! :-))) Victor At first I thought it was a spoof, but it appears to be genuine. Whether liberties have been taken with context I can't say. The rest about Blair though is 100% true co's I said so. Philip Eden has already told us that Bellamy is a member of the UK Independence Party, but since politics is banned on this newsgroup I can say no more :-( Blair announce at Prime Minister's questions last Wednesday that when he was holding the Chairmanship of both the EU and of the Club of Nine (or whatever) he would be concentrating on the twin problems of Africa and Global Warming. I thought, Lawrence, you would be relieved to hear that :-) Cheers, Alastair. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , lawrence jenkins
writes OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". In an article in the Mail on Sunday Bellamy rails against claims that "mans actions could ultimately destroy the planet" as the 'biggest scam to hit the world'. He may be an "environmentalist" when it suits him, but his extreme right wing political stance prevents him from having an objective view on GW. He is probably just after some free publicity for his book launch anyway. Even former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who first picked up on Global Warming as a serious issue wasn't so far off to the right that she ignored good scientific advice. is scientifically proven that 99 per cent of the worlds greenhouse emissions come from natural sources over which we have no control. Yet millions are being spent which will have no effect whatsoever on global warming. How odd then that the observed build up of CO2 gas in the atmosphere shows the characteristic isotopic signature of fossil fuels... Part of what he says is true - we cannot spend on alternatives or improve energy efficiency fast enough to prevent significant GW so we are going to have to adapt to it. Rising sea levels and modified rainfall patterns are two likely consequences that are already beginning to show up on insurance claims. We must wait patiently until something obviously caused by GW seriously affects the US. Only then will the subject be taken seriously. Regards, -- Martin Brown |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Brown" wrote in message ... In message , lawrence jenkins writes OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". In an article in the Mail on Sunday Bellamy rails against claims that "mans actions could ultimately destroy the planet" as the 'biggest scam to hit the world'. He may be an "environmentalist" when it suits him, but his extreme right wing political stance prevents him from having an objective view on GW. He is probably just after some free publicity for his book launch anyway. Even former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who first picked up on Global Warming as a serious issue wasn't so far off to the right that she ignored good scientific advice. is scientifically proven that 99 per cent of the worlds greenhouse emissions come from natural sources over which we have no control. Yet millions are being spent which will have no effect whatsoever on global warming. How odd then that the observed build up of CO2 gas in the atmosphere shows the characteristic isotopic signature of fossil fuels... Part of what he says is true - we cannot spend on alternatives or improve energy efficiency fast enough to prevent significant GW so we are going to have to adapt to it. Rising sea levels and modified rainfall patterns are two likely consequences that are already beginning to show up on insurance claims. We must wait patiently until something obviously caused by GW seriously affects the US. Only then will the subject be taken seriously. Regards, -- Martin Brown There is a letter published in the New Scientist from four individuals who work for Rothamsted Research or the Hadley Centre for Cimate research stating that Bellamy has been highly selective with the evidence he has used and therefore has only given one part of the story which is highly misleading. This was in response to a letter written by David Bellamy published on the 22nd of May putting foward the views mentioned above. Alan |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ================================================== ================== This posting expresses the personal view and opinions of the author. Something which everyone on this planet should be able to do. ================================================== ================== I rarely enter into GW debates but feel I must say something here. It is a measurable fact that the earth is now warming up, ie global warming is happening. And that is all we have in truth, the rest is just theories with some based on sound science and others based on vested interests or personal gain. Will. -- " A cup is most useful when empty " ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A COL BH site in East Dartmoor at Haytor, Devon 310m asl (1017 feet). mailto: www: http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk DISCLAIMER - All views and opinions expressed by myself are personal and do not necessarily represent those of my employer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- lawrence jenkins wrote in message ... OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". In an article in the Mail on Sunday Bellamy rails against claims that "mans actions could ultimately destroy the planet" as the 'biggest scam to hit the world'. He criticises the Government for resorting to 'scare tactics' to justify its misguided crusade. He said 'It is scientifically proven that 99 per cent of the worlds greenhouse emissions come from natural sources over which we have no control. Yet millions are being spent which will have no effect whatsoever on global warming. The money should be spent on providing fresh water and sanitation to the most deprived areas of the world' Blimey! I would not have expected that from him off all people. I had a further search on the net and found reference to a letter in New Scientist titled "hooray for global warming" Alas as I am an 'anti-scientist' I couldn't access the archives. There has also been a riposte to Sir david houghton (chief government advisor to St Tony) in the daily Telegraph. Now Saint Tony Blair of course has stated that "Global warming was the most serious long term threat facing the planet' and has vowed to cut emmisions by 15.2 per cent (I assume the .2 per cent is Prescott's two jags) by 2010! Off course the Sainted Tony being a scientist by nature (unlike me according to the great Chief Dancey with wolves) is a devout catholic (you know the lot that still teach that the world was made in seven days). Now he and his "new-age" wife Cherie , recently went through a rebirthing ceremony in Mexico. Apparently they rubbed lots of mud, fruit and vegetables into each others bodies. Well all I can say is, that before wicked humans entered the industrial age it was common for folk to carry out a very similar activity; it was called the "Stocks and Pillories"! I now await for those methane producing human stools, to hit the wind-turbines. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Will" wrote in message ... ================================================== ================== This posting expresses the personal view and opinions of the author. Something which everyone on this planet should be able to do. ================================================== ================== I rarely enter into GW debates but feel I must say something here. It is a measurable fact that the earth is now warming up, ie global warming is happening. And that is all we have in truth, the rest is just theories with some based on sound science and others based on vested interests or personal gain. Will. -- " A cup is most useful when empty " -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- .. Well Will. Most on here have far greater scientific knowledge than me. The cynic in me though is always looking for the angle. Here I believe especially in the UK, where so few actually work to support increasingly the many that don't, that state expenditure is now so high that other ways to raise revenue are now being used in particularly Global warming. All businesses now pay a climate levy that is reflected in the consumer price. So hype up the dangers and charge accordingly. I'll say one last thing. The exclusion zone in London was brought in by Mr Livingstone and is now planned to be extended. This was never about global warming or pollution or even congestion. No. The fact is if every motorist pays the £5, the traffic levels can go back to what they were before the scheme started! Great lots of revenue for Ken's scatty schemes you know the "gay Museum" sort of thing. Opps getting political now. I'm probably still smarting after hearing (knew for some time actually) plans to extend the mens retirement age to 70. Mind you Will you've already retired I believe . There will be millions though not so fortunate. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Brown" wrote in message ... In message , lawrence jenkins writes OT but I can't resist it. That well known and loved environmentalist David Bellamy has come out and ....wait for it.... .......attacked what he calls "the great global warming scam". In an article in the Mail on Sunday Bellamy rails against claims that "mans actions could ultimately destroy the planet" as the 'biggest scam to hit the world'. He may be an "environmentalist" when it suits him, but his extreme right wing political stance prevents him from having an objective view on GW. He is probably just after some free publicity for his book launch anyway. Even former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who first picked up on Global Warming as a serious issue wasn't so far off to the right that she ignored good scientific advice. is scientifically proven that 99 per cent of the worlds greenhouse emissions come from natural sources over which we have no control. Yet millions are being spent which will have no effect whatsoever on global warming. How odd then that the observed build up of CO2 gas in the atmosphere shows the characteristic isotopic signature of fossil fuels... Part of what he says is true - we cannot spend on alternatives or improve energy efficiency fast enough to prevent significant GW so we are going to have to adapt to it. Rising sea levels and modified rainfall patterns are two likely consequences that are already beginning to show up on insurance claims. We must wait patiently until something obviously caused by GW seriously affects the US. Only then will the subject be taken seriously. Rising sea levels may well at least help their voting system as much of Florida is not much above sea level. Peter |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Lawrence
writes "Will" wrote in message ... ================================================== ================== This posting expresses the personal view and opinions of the author. Something which everyone on this planet should be able to do. ================================================== ================== I rarely enter into GW debates but feel I must say something here. It is a measurable fact that the earth is now warming up, ie global warming is happening. Admitting that puts you one step ahead of Bush and his US big oil cronies. My own position on this issue not all that far from that of BP's. And that is all we have in truth, the rest is just theories with some based on sound science and others based on vested interests or personal gain. Actually the increases in CO2 concentration (and its isotopic signature) coupled with the constraints imposed by direct satellite measurement of solar flux mean that even the most extreme right wing real scientists have privately admitted that they cannot maintain the reasonable doubt argument beyond 2010 without selling their souls. But just like with tobacco there will be some volunteers using legally crafted formulations of words to reassure the public that smoking is safe. Well Will. Most on here have far greater scientific knowledge than me. The cynic in me though is always looking for the angle. Here I believe especially in the UK, where so few actually work to support increasingly the many that don't, that state expenditure is now so high that other ways to raise revenue are now being used in particularly Global warming. You are paranoid. Unemployment is relatively low in the UK now. Try reading the Economist's take on the science behind GW and get back to reality. The really serious problem with Global Warming is that it is occurring very slowly compared to the 5 year planning horizons of our rather dumb politicians. Margaret Thatcher was exceptional in realising just how serious a long term issue this will ultimately become. We cannot realistically stop it, but we can still slow it down and buy more time. And at the same time make finite oil reserves last longer. All businesses now pay a climate levy that is reflected in the consumer price. So hype up the dangers and charge accordingly. I don't mind at all if the doubters buy some insurance so that when the evidence becomes absolutely compelling there is some chance of doing something about it. I don't necessarily agree with the climate levy, but at least they are trying to do something. We will look pretty silly otherwise when the Thames barrier is no longer high enough to protect London. It is sheer insanity to refuse even to consider no regrets energy efficiency measures and continue mass producing ever less efficient SUV's. US vehicle fuel efficiency is heading down towards 10mpg at present. Regards, -- Martin Brown |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Glaciers Were Smaller Before They Were Bigger Before They Were Smaller | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Glaciers Were Smaller Before They Were Bigger Before They Were Smaller | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
"Scientists" Were Hysterical About Global Cooling In The 1970'sAs Well | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
"Scientists" Were Hysterical About Global Cooling In The 1970'sAs Well | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Locusts: landholders were urged to become "nymphomaniacs" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |