Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an article from the scientific press which reinforces my views of the
misreporting of the global warming "debate" by the BBC. It is not only in hte US that the balance is biased! Cheers, Alastair. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press Maxwell T. Boykoff and Jules M. Boykoff Global Environmental Change Part A Volume 14, Issue 2 , July 2004, Pages 125-136 Abstract This paper demonstrates that US prestige-press coverage of global warming from 1988 to 2002 has contributed to a significant divergence of popular discourse from scientific discourse. This failed discursive translation results from an accumulation of tactical media responses and practices guided by widely accepted journalistic norms. Through content analysis of US prestige press-meaning the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and the Wall Street Journal-this paper focuses on the norm of balanced reporting, and shows that the prestige press's adherence to balance actually leads to biased coverage of both anthropogenic contributions to global warming and resultant action. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alastair McDonald" k
wrote in message Here is an article from the scientific press which reinforces my views of the misreporting of the global warming "debate" by the BBC. It is not only in hte US that the balance is biased! Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press Maxwell T. Boykoff and Jules M. Boykoff Global Environmental Change Part A Volume 14, Issue 2 , July 2004, Pages 125-136 Technology Already Exists to Stabilize Global Warming August 12 — Existing technologies could stop the escalation of global warming for 50 years and work on implementing them can begin immediately, according to an analysis by Princeton University scientists. (PhysOrg.com, Christian Science Monitor) New Findings Show Earth is Not Getting Warmer August 12 — Contrary to most research, a new study finds the Earth is not warming significantly, say scientists with the universities of Rochester and Virginia. (U.S. Newswire) Reefs Get Global Warming Lifeline August 11 — New research shows that some forms of algae can allow coral to withstand higher temperatures, potentially reducing the impact of global warming. (Nature, CBC) Almost every other article in: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/New...01/200108.html is about global warming. In a democratic use of statistics, global warming would be proven. Fortunately most sciences still require facts not opinion. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:21:04 +0100, "Alastair McDonald"
k wrote: Here is an article from the scientific press which reinforces my views of the misreporting of the global warming "debate" by the BBC. It is not only in hte US that the balance is biased! I interpreted the paper as saying that because the reporting was *balanced* - not biased - because of "journalistic balance" - that not enough weight is being given to global warming. That GW is even worse than the papers make out as the press is trying to be so balanced in its reporting. Part of the conclusion states "The central messages in the generally-agreed-upon scientific discourse have therefore not be proliferated by the mass media into the popular arena". The author states "The proper response to public doubts is not to increase the public's technical knowledge about and therefore belief in the scientific facts of global war,ing. Rather it should be to increase the public understanding of and therefore trust in the social process through which those facts are scientifically determined". I think the author is saying - stuff the science, if we present global warming using good drama, then the public will take note. But I see the BBC as *not* giving a balanced view of GW. I haven't seen or heard documentaries talking about global staying pretty much the same, some years better, some years worse. Jeepers. Last years fabulous summer was blamed on global warming. And so is this years dire summer. "Worst August on record" screams the BBC, ignoring all the other wetter Augusts. Anyway, I'm even more confused now. Noz -- Email (ROT13) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Global Temperature Trends with Bias | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Global Temperature Trends with Bias | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
PhD positions available for glacier mass balance studies at UNBC (Canada) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Climate: Earth's heat balance in the red | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Weather Channel press release on global warming... | ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) |