Firstly, just in case you are wondering where "Part 1" is:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...7688f873c37904

Secondly, I have made some "slight" amendments, as the first one has
one or two grammarian errors - but just one or two, I must stress!:-o
:-)
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...cf19560e9a485a


Gianna:

Does heaven on Earth exist? Hell, yes!;-) :-o It exists in Eastern
Europe, homeland of the Slavs.
Pity you did not live under Stalin's rule. You would not have
survived.

Explain?:-(

FACT: The Slavs are Europe's LARGEST race.
Size isn't everything. Mostyn.

Disagree.

If that were the case, then Southern Siberia would today not be under
threat.

FACT: The Slav is the most LEAST written about Indo-European ethnic
group in the WHOLE of Europe AND Asia!:-o
'most least'? meaningless! Don't forget the real Aryans.

Aryans=IRANIANS.

The "master race" of Abu Ala - or "Adolf Hitler", as he is known in the
West - saw the Iranians as the natural élite, with the Arabs in second
position. The Slavs - who suffered the MOST out of the "Holocaust" -
were to be their SLAVES.:-(

By the way, in answer to your question though, why is the FICTIONAL
"Aryan"/Iranian race the 'most least' written about race in the whole
of Europe, and presumably you mean Asia too?

FACT: The Slavic SERBS are the most HATED ethnic group in the whole
of
Europe, even more than, amazingly, the Jews!:-o :-(
Good to see common sense prevailing then.

Thank you.:-)

By the way, 'ethnic' refers generally to race, whereas 'jew' refers
to a
persons religious persuasion.

That is true. However, many Jews from countries like Russia and Poland
will NOT be "Poles" or "Russians" by ETHNICITY, they would remain true
western SEMITES. There is no such thing really as "Polish Jew" or
"Russian Jew".

I.e.: Roman Abramovich - called "Red Rom" by the general Western, in
particular the British, media:

1. He CAN'T be "Red", certainly not in the true, classic sense of the
word, because he is a CAPITALIST!:-o :-(
2. He CANNOT be "Russian", because he is a JEW!:-o

Why he rules over a region of Russia which is even further east than
most of the Sinitic/Japanese countries is truly beyond me!:-o

Serbs are probably the most disliked
race.

As history proves. They were also Hitler's "Untermenschen".:-(

The most disliked religious group is probably muslims, rather
than jews. If you doubt that, ask a Serb.

1. There are/were HARDLY ANY Jews in Yugoslavia and the Southern Balkan
Slavic countries as things currently stand. As of the SMALL number of
Jews that there actually were, they have been, historically, "quite"
good to the communists, helping Tito's regime. They then largely all
disappeared after that, perhaps in emigration to Israel, I don't know.
2. The Muslim populations of the whole Western Balkan region were 99%
TERRORIST. WE know this DEFINITIVELY, from speeches by leaders like
KARADZIC and MILOSEVIC, and it was something was agreed upon by BOTH
communists - Milosevic - and nationalists - Karadzic, Mladic - alike.
Then, the Slavic people took ACTION, to banish the Muslim curse from at
least Southern Slavia, AND THEN AMERICA WENT AND BOMBED US!!! Then they
have the NERVE to CRY on September 11 AFTER LIBERATING Srebrenica. How
dare they! HOW DARE THEY!:-o :-( :-(

Then where did the Muslims go? The answer is BACK HOME, to MOROCCO, and
SAUDI ARABIA - this one just comes up TIME AND TIME AGAIN!:-( - , and
AFGHANISTAN, and IRAN, and theocratic, radical SOUTHERN LEBANON, ETC.,
ETC.!:-o :-(

Don't give me that neo-Republican "they/we have learnt" crap. If this
was true, then why are events in the Caucasus the same, today?

Western involvements in the APPALLING events like BESLAN last September
have been PROVED, once again also DEFINITIVELY, and I can show you this
if you like.

And you wonder why some 80+(!) of Slavs hate today's West? You wonder
why the Arabs don't want to share in today's Slavic "democracy"?:-o

:-(

Surely, this is MORE THAN ENOUGH reason for EVERY
Slav/Serb/Caucasian/Central Asian/Balt/North Korean/whatever in the
entire WORLD to profess Marxism-Leninism as a POLITICAL ideology?:-o

:-(

The intrinsically biased Western European history books were written
by
imperial, monarchist colonists!
And the eastern european history books were written by your fellow
AMOEBAE no doubt.
:-(

The Eastern European history books are BY FAR more reliable than the
Western European "history" books.

For example, everyone in the West who did pre-Year 9/Third Grade(?)
History as a subject at school knows about such events as the D-Day
landings, the allied push into Germany, Dresden, etc.. Yet, who knows
about what the Russians today call THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR? I certainly
DIDN'T when I left school!:-o :-(

In fact, when I left school, I didn't even know who Lenin and Stalin
were!:-o :-( However, I have since managed to FULLY educate myself in
Soviet and Cold War affairs post-high school to a highly permissible
degree. Surely, you must agree that this is not bad, to say the very
least, for somebody who did not even pursue History, as a school
subject, beyond Year 9, and left school with only knowledge of Hitler
as a last major wartime dictator!:-o :-(

History is written by the winner

This is true, to some degree. À la Fukuyama, Brzezinski, etc..

and is usually restricted to political
or regal leaders, and wars.

Well, obviously.

Only thing missing from most history books
is meaningful history.

THEN WHY DO YOU DENY IT!?:-o :-( :-(

You might try studying a known language

-I speak the following languages FLUENTLY: ENGLISH, POLISH,
-I speak the following languages SEMI-fluently: Iberian SPANISH,
-I have REASONABLE KNOWLEDGE of the following languages: FRENCH,
LATIN(!).

and if trying to use a big word
(in your case, a word with two or more syllables) do look it up in a
respected dictionary - you obviously have no idea what they mean.

LOL.

Your BLATANT insult notwithstanding, I don't think that
"Dictionary.com" is a VALID "respected" dictionary source of
information!:-o

At least "The Concise Oxford English Dictionary" has SOME respect and
modern founding to it, even if that is bourgeoisie in origin.

D.

Answer it this time!:-o :-(

D.

Answer it this time!:-o :-(

D.

Answer it this time!:-o :-(

D.

Answer it this time!:-o :-(

D.

Bump for Gianna.:-)

D.

Bump for Gianna.:-)

D.

Bump for Gianna.:-)

D.

Bump for Gianna.:-)

D.

Bump II.;-)

D.