uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #91   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default Attn Col

I wasn't aware we *had* an alliance but if we did it should be me
that is ending it. You've got me into big trouble with the netcops
on this group, apparently I'm not allowed to reply to you!


If they want to act like children, then that is their problem.

Or, alternatively, if you so prefer:

If they want to act like the children that they ARE, then that is THEIR
problem.

D.


  #92   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default Attn Col

I wasn't aware we *had* an alliance but if we did it should be me
that is ending it. You've got me into big trouble with the netcops
on this group, apparently I'm not allowed to reply to you!


If they want to act like children, then that is their problem.

Or, alternatively, if you so prefer:

If they want to act like the children that they ARE, then that is THEIR
problem.

D.

  #93   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
Default Attn Col

I wasn't aware we *had* an alliance but if we did it should be me
that is ending it. You've got me into big trouble with the netcops
on this group, apparently I'm not allowed to reply to you!


If they want to act like children, then that is their problem.

Or, alternatively, if you so prefer:

If they want to act like the children that they ARE, then that is THEIR
problem.

D.

  #94   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,740
Default Attn Col

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:11:42 -0000, "Col"
wrote:

Fine. As long as that applied to *all* OT banter.


Where it's a dialogue, why not?

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Web site:- http://www.alan.lesley.ukgateway.net
  #95   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,740
Default Attn Col

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:11:42 -0000, "Col"
wrote:

Fine. As long as that applied to *all* OT banter.


Where it's a dialogue, why not?

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Web site:- http://www.alan.lesley.ukgateway.net


  #96   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,740
Default Attn Col

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:11:42 -0000, "Col"
wrote:

Fine. As long as that applied to *all* OT banter.


Where it's a dialogue, why not?

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Web site:- http://www.alan.lesley.ukgateway.net
  #97   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 04:41 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,740
Default Attn Col

On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:11:42 -0000, "Col"
wrote:

Fine. As long as that applied to *all* OT banter.


Where it's a dialogue, why not?

--
Alan White
Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland.
Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm
Web site:- http://www.alan.lesley.ukgateway.net
  #98   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 05:28 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 101
Default Attn Col


"Howard Neil" wrote in message
...
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment

at
his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may

enjoy
what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not

wish to
see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS

and
argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your

needling of
the boy and his responses.


Well said, Rob.

I only hope that Col listens. I don't want to have to killfile him as
his posts are usually worth reading.

--
Howard Neil


But not Lawrence Jenkins' posts.

Joe



  #99   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 05:28 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 101
Default Attn Col


"Howard Neil" wrote in message
...
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment

at
his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may

enjoy
what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not

wish to
see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS

and
argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your

needling of
the boy and his responses.


Well said, Rob.

I only hope that Col listens. I don't want to have to killfile him as
his posts are usually worth reading.

--
Howard Neil


But not Lawrence Jenkins' posts.

Joe



  #100   Report Post  
Old March 5th 05, 05:28 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
Joe Joe is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 101
Default Attn Col


"Howard Neil" wrote in message
...
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment

at
his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may

enjoy
what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not

wish to
see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS

and
argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your

needling of
the boy and his responses.


Well said, Rob.

I only hope that Col listens. I don't want to have to killfile him as
his posts are usually worth reading.

--
Howard Neil


But not Lawrence Jenkins' posts.

Joe





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
attn counter-intuitive active spam Weatherlawyer alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) 0 February 3rd 07 07:05 PM
Attn: Damien Tom uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 12 February 22nd 05 12:11 AM
Attn Martin aka JPG BWS uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 December 17th 04 11:47 PM
ATTN: AV Brief Users. ab uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 August 5th 04 04:56 PM
Attn: Government tornado forecasters Apr. 21, 2004 edgrsprj uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 10 April 24th 04 11:01 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017