Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Hyett wrote:
I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? -- Jonathan Stott Canterbury Weather: http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/ |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Joe Egginton
writes You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I use as a return address when I post to newsgroups. I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per cent sure of. -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (please reply to ) |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Joe Egginton
writes You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I use as a return address when I post to newsgroups. I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per cent sure of. -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (please reply to ) |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Joe Egginton
writes You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I use as a return address when I post to newsgroups. I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per cent sure of. -- Anita Evans North Cumbria (please reply to ) |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want to reply personally |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want to reply personally |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun. -- Kate B PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want to reply personally |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
: Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? You can stop all those of the type I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That seems to block 99% of spam. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
: Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? You can stop all those of the type I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That seems to block 99% of spam. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
: Paul Hyett wrote: I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see these spam floods, thank goodness. How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam? You can stop all those of the type I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That seems to block 99% of spam. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC email | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A Killer Email Message - How to Write Killer Email Promos that Get Results | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Email alerts for severe weather warnings? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A very nice email response... | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |