Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low
thickness values for Xmas day. These persist for a further couple of days before warming takes place from the SW. This is complicated by a further plunge of cold air for New Year, albeit not as cold as over Xmas. Conditions look ripe for snow and very cold conditions - negative day maximums over wide areas on Boxing day and the 27th. The situation is not too different to 1981 when cold advection took place from the Northwest with 510 DM air over the UK. Those of us that can remember the set up in 1981 will remember the very deep snowfalls that this situation produced. Regards Rob Farsley http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robert....3/Farsley.html |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ROBERT BROOKS" wrote in message
... I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low thickness values for Xmas day. These persist for a further couple of days before warming takes place from the SW. This is complicated by a further plunge of cold air for New Year, albeit not as cold as over Xmas. Conditions look ripe for snow and very cold conditions - negative day maximums over wide areas on Boxing day and the 27th. The situation is not too different to 1981 when cold advection took place from the Northwest with 510 DM air over the UK. Those of us that can remember the set up in 1981 will remember the very deep snowfalls that this situation produced. Regards Rob Farsley http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robert....3/Farsley.html Right on the limits of my memory that one. (I was only 8 years old) I cant remember the synoptic situation, but I do remember Santa gave me a plastic sledge that Xmas and I had several good winters out of it, before I destroyed the plastic runners on a frost (rather than on snow) sometime in 1987. Alex บบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบ Alex Stephens Jr Wishaw, North Lanarkshire, Scotland N55บ47'14", W3บ55'15". 360ft/117m amsl http://www.alex114.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ บบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ROBERT BROOKS" wrote in message ... I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low thickness values for Xmas day. These persist for a further couple of days before warming takes place from the SW. This is complicated by a further plunge of cold air for New Year, albeit not as cold as over Xmas. Conditions look ripe for snow and very cold conditions - negative day maximums over wide areas on Boxing day and the 27th. The situation is not too different to 1981 when cold advection took place from the Northwest with 510 DM air over the UK. Those of us that can remember the set up in 1981 will remember the very deep snowfalls that this situation produced. Regards Exactly. I was forecasting in 1981 and I remember it well. 30cm level snow at Heathrow. That's part of the forecasting process of course, experience. I've also seen slow moving baroclinic zones oriented NW-SE just to west of UK a few times as well. These can produce some nasty surprises as warm front waves run south bringing heavy snow to the east of them. Nightmare to forecast in detail. IIRC the mild air often comes in slower than expected, hence caution is required in warming things up too quickly after Boxing day. Cheers, Will. -- " Visit Haytor meteorological office at http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...met_office.htm " ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A COL BH site in East Dartmoor at Haytor, Devon 310m asl (1017 feet). mailto: www: http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk DISCLAIMER - All views and opinions expressed by myself are personal and do not necessarily represent those of my employer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Will Hand" wrote in message
... Snip I've also seen slow moving baroclinic zones oriented NW-SE just to west of UK a few times as well. These can produce some nasty surprises as warm front waves run south bringing heavy snow to the east of them. Talking of waves (T+96) http://imkpc3.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/pics/brack3.gif Jon. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low
thickness values for Xmas day. GFS has been consistently forecasting roughly the same scenario every run since 17 December. Low to NE and High to SW bringing in very cold wind. The only thing that has been changing is exactly the precise strength and direction of the wind. The 528 dam line has also been slightly wobbling. Wind direction has varied between W and NW and NNW. I have been archiving the Christmas Day GFS runs every day... http://www.djmurphy.demon.co.uk/christmas I'm sure the runs for the next few days will see a similar scenario. Brendan |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brendan DJ Murphy wrote:
I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low thickness values for Xmas day. GFS has been consistently forecasting roughly the same scenario every run since 17 December. Low to NE and High to SW bringing in very cold wind. The only thing that has been changing is exactly the precise strength and direction of the wind. The 528 dam line has also been slightly wobbling. Wind direction has varied between W and NW and NNW. I have been archiving the Christmas Day GFS runs every day... http://www.djmurphy.demon.co.uk/christmas I'm sure the runs for the next few days will see a similar scenario. One problem I have with GFS is that about a week ago one run, well into the forecast, had a slow-moving old low over the northern North Sea with thickness in its circulation averaging 528. Further in to the forecast, the whole of the area of circulation of the low had thicknesses below 528. I found it difficult to believe that a low sitting over the warm sea would cool down in this way. In my experience the reverse is more likely. Graham |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ROBERT BROOKS" wrote in message ... I have been following the GFS model - it has consistently forecast low thickness values for Xmas day. These persist for a further couple of days before warming takes place from the SW. This is complicated by a further plunge of cold air for New Year, albeit not as cold as over Xmas. Conditions look ripe for snow and very cold conditions - negative day maximums over wide areas on Boxing day and the 27th. The situation is not too different to 1981 when cold advection took place from the Northwest with 510 DM air over the UK. Those of us that can remember the set up in 1981 will remember the very deep snowfalls that this situation produced. Regards Rob Farsley http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robert....3/Farsley.html And in 1981 it lasted for over 3 weeks. This cold spell seems like just another of these quickies. These have become common in the last 3 years. 2 or 3 days and thats your lot. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Gavin Staples writes: And in 1981 it lasted for over 3 weeks. This cold spell seems like just another of these quickies. These have become common in the last 3 years. 2 or 3 days and thats your lot. I think that such short spells always have been much commoner than the long ones. It's just that it's only the long ones that we remember a couple of decades afterwards. -- John Hall "It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is not necessarily a problem with GFS, but with using the
1000-500mb thickness as the determining factor of what is warm and cold. Yes, the low would tend to warm out at the lowest levels, but if the surface pressure is below 1000mb then I assume the model calculates the negative 1000mb height using the standard formula. In addition, if the cold advection aloft is rapid, then the height of the 500mb level might be falling faster than the calculated 1000mb level is rising, thus the thickness of the layer will continue to decrease temporarily. I hope that makes sense. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Very cold Boxing Day in N Scotland: Aviemore -2.4ยฐC maximum | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Very mild Boxing Day in SW England: Exeter Airport 12.1ฐC | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Low thickness | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[WR] S.Essex - mildest day since Boxing Day | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Very low thickness values approaching from West | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |