Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MCC wrote:
See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertain...io/4698329.stm right at the bottom of the article. Are but will they listen? -- Keith (Southend) 'Weather Home & Abroad' http://www.southendweather.net |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith (Southend) wrote:
MCC wrote: See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertain...io/4698329.stm right at the bottom of the article. Are but will they listen? They are listening - I've seen plenty more synoptic charts of late and wind speed arrows have made a return. One problem I noticed last week when I was watching the world forecasts on BBC World - if there's a *lot* of rain (as there was when showing the monsoons over India and Bangladesh), the animation really starts the chug! -- Jonathan Stott Canterbury Weather: http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/ Reverse my e-mail address to reply by e-mail |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Stott" wrote in message ... They are listening - I've seen plenty more synoptic charts of late and wind speed arrows have made a return. One problem I noticed last week when I was watching the world forecasts on BBC World - if there's a *lot* of rain (as there was when showing the monsoons over India and Bangladesh), the animation really starts the chug! Agree they seem to be listening after initial arrogance. John Hammond's countryfile forecast was very good on Sunday and included synoptic runs and many of the charts now include wind speed (in the old style arrows). The whole thing is still not as clear and unambiguous as before though. I think they must throw away much of the Metservice stuff and start again. I will be interesting to see how UK-wide cloudy days, fog, snow, sleet etc are represented. We already know they have nothing to indicate the difference between heavy rain and thunderstorm activity. Did they ever get negative feedback relating to the old graphics? David |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Haggas" wrote in message
Did they ever get negative feedback relating to the old graphics? Did they ever listen if they did? They may be or rather they are supposedly free from political bias but that doesn't top them being politicians in all but name: "Complaining about the weather map has overtaken complaining about the weather as the favourite national past-time," he said. And the complaints are as ever more or less ignored we said. Don't hope for the best and you won't be disappointed. For the life of me I can't see what was wrong with the old graphics. Why didn't they just computerise them? This is 2005 not 1995. If they wanted free help from a large resource, they could have appealed to the open programme writers at Mozillazine, the cheap bsradas. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Asylum seekers are using a RAILWAY tunnel to save time going to theshop (Germany) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Light rain early afternoon in Brussels but a sunny end to the day | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Clouds ridge light 1 - clouds ridge light 1s.jpg (1/1) | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Clouds ridge light 2 - clouds ridge light 2s.jpg (1/1) | alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) | |||
Light at the end of the (Euro) Tunnel | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |