Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Philips column in the Tele was quite interesting. He was saying that the
NAO, which has been used as evidence for this (cold) forthcoming winter, was more likely a result of the previous winter, rather than a sign for the forthcoming one! Phil -- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/phil.layton/meteo.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Phil Layton writes: Philips column in the Tele was quite interesting. He was saying that the NAO, which has been used as evidence for this (cold) forthcoming winter, was more likely a result of the previous winter, rather than a sign for the forthcoming one! Apparently the MO predict the coming winter's NAO based on May's Atlantic SST anomalies. I suppose that those May anomalies are going to be greatly influenced by what the previous winter's circulation pattern was like. I wonder why May is used. You would think that taking a later month would give a better prediction. Surely it can't require several months to process the data? -- John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?" "Well, actually, they're American." "So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?" Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Felly sgrifennodd John Hall :
Apparently the MO predict the coming winter's NAO based on May's Atlantic SST anomalies. I suppose that those May anomalies are going to be greatly influenced by what the previous winter's circulation pattern was like. I wonder why May is used. You would think that taking a later month would give a better prediction. Surely it can't require several months to process the data? As I think I posted at the time this came up before, I don't understand that either. You'd think that if May's was found the best, surely some statistical input from other months would at least help the model somewhat. So why not form a model on a number of months' data? A decent analysis technique would chuck out data that wasn't important anyway, so there's not a lot to lose (principle of parsimony excepted). Adrian -- Adrian Shaw ais@ Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, aber. Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Cymru ac. http://users.aber.ac.uk/ais uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|